Wrinkle relaxers like Botox and Dysport have become a regular part of aesthetic care for many people in San Diego. These treatments offer a non-surgical way to reduce fine lines and improve facial symmetry, often in a single visit.
But if you’re comparing Botox and Dysport, you might wonder: Are they the same, or are there real differences that could affect your results?
Here’s what to know before deciding.
Botox vs. Dysport: How They Work
Botox and Dysport are both injectable neuromodulators derived from botulinum toxin type A. When injected into specific facial muscles, they temporarily block nerve signals that cause those muscles to contract. This helps reduce dynamic wrinkles, such as frown lines or forehead creases.
Although they share the same core ingredient, the formulations differ slightly:
- Dysport has a smaller protein size, which means it can spread more easily once injected.
- Botox is more localized, which may offer more control in small or detailed treatment areas.
The right option for you often depends on the treated area, how your body responds, and your aesthetic goals.
How Fast Will You See Results?
Dysport may begin working sooner, with many patients noticing results within two to three days.
Botox typically takes three to five days, with full results appearing around one to two weeks after treatment.
Both products deliver results that generally last three to four months, depending on how your body metabolizes the product and how expressive your facial muscles are. Routine treatments every three to four months can help maintain results over time.
Treatment Areas: Botox vs. Dysport
Here’s how Botox and Dysport are typically used:
Botox is often recommended for:
- Crow’s feet
- Glabellar lines (between the eyebrows)
- Lip lines
- Chin dimpling
Dysport may be a better fit for:
- Horizontal forehead lines
- Larger treatment zones requiring broader diffusion
- Some off-label neck treatments
In some cases, your provider may recommend combining both products in different areas of the face to achieve a more balanced result.
Cost Comparison
Botox and Dysport’s cost structure differs, but the total treatment price is often similar.
- Botox is priced per unit and requires fewer units per treatment area.
- Dysport uses more units per area, but each unit tends to cost less.
The number of units needed depends on muscle strength, treatment area, and your desired outcome. Always prioritize an experienced provider who can make precise dosing decisions. Improper placement—regardless of the product—can lead to poor results.
Which Injectable Is Right for You?
If you’re deciding between Botox and Dysport, consider the following:
- You may prefer Dysport if you want faster onset and are treating a larger area, like the forehead.
- You may prefer Botox if you’re focusing on smaller areas that require more precision.
If you’ve used one successfully before, it may be wise to continue using it unless your provider recommends otherwise.
Some patients respond slightly better to one product over the other. A consultation is the best way to assess which option will work best for your facial structure and treatment goals.
Why Choose Dr. Mofid at San Diego Skin
Dr. Mark Mofid is a board-certified plastic surgeon with years of experience in surgical and non-surgical aesthetic procedures. At San Diego Skin, every injectable treatment is planned around the patient’s muscle activity, facial proportions, and long-term goals.
Rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, Dr. Mofid focuses on subtle, natural-looking outcomes and honest recommendations. Whether new to wrinkle relaxers or simply deciding between two trusted options, you’ll receive clear guidance and professional care.
Schedule Your Wrinkle Relaxer Consultation in San Diego
Choosing between Botox and Dysport isn’t just about the product—it’s about finding the right treatment plan for your face.
Schedule a consultation with Dr. Mofid at San Diego Skin to learn which injectable best matches your needs.